[ceph-users] ceph-disk is now deprecated

Maged Mokhtar mmokhtar at petasan.org
Tue Nov 28 04:20:33 PST 2017

I tend to agree with Wido. May of us still reply on ceph-disk and hope
to see it live a little longer. 


On 2017-11-28 13:54, Alfredo Deza wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido at 42on.com> wrote: 
> Op 27 november 2017 om 14:36 schreef Alfredo Deza <adeza at redhat.com>:
> For the upcoming Luminous release (12.2.2), ceph-disk will be
> officially in 'deprecated' mode (bug fixes only). A large banner with
> deprecation information has been added, which will try to raise
> awareness.
> As much as I like ceph-volume and the work being done, is it really a good idea to use a minor release to deprecate a tool?
> Can't we just introduce ceph-volume and deprecate ceph-disk at the release of M? Because when you upgrade to 12.2.2 suddenly existing integrations will have deprecation warnings being thrown at them while they haven't upgraded to a new major version.

ceph-volume has been present since the very first release of Luminous,
the deprecation warning in ceph-disk is the only "new" thing
introduced for 12.2.2.

> As ceph-deploy doesn't support ceph-disk either I don't think it's a good idea to deprecate it right now.

ceph-deploy work is being done to support ceph-volume exclusively
(ceph-disk support is dropped fully), which will mean a change in its
API in a non-backwards compatible
way. A major version change in ceph-deploy, documentation, and a bunch
of documentation is being worked on to allow users to transition to

> How do others feel about this?
> Wido
>> We are strongly suggesting using ceph-volume for new (and old) OSD
>> deployments. The only current exceptions to this are encrypted OSDs
>> and FreeBSD systems
>> Encryption support is planned and will be coming soon to ceph-volume.
>> A few items to consider:
>> * ceph-disk is expected to be fully removed by the Mimic release
>> * Existing OSDs are supported by ceph-volume. They can be "taken over" [0 [1]]
>> * ceph-ansible already fully supports ceph-volume and will soon default to it
>> * ceph-deploy support is planned and should be fully implemented soon
>> [0] http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/ceph-volume/simple/
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users at lists.ceph.com


[1] http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/ceph-volume/simple/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20171128/c3ce5aa9/attachment.html>

More information about the ceph-users mailing list