[ceph-users] rados_read versus rados_aio_read performance

Maged Mokhtar mmokhtar at petasan.org
Sun Oct 1 10:03:16 PDT 2017


On 2017-10-01 16:47, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:

> Hi, Gregory! 
> 
> Thanks for the comment.  I compiled simple program to play with write speed measurements (from librados examples). Underline "write" functions are: 
> rados_write(io, "hw", read_res, 1048576, i*1048576); 
> rados_aio_write(io, "foo", comp, read_res, 1048576, i*1048576); 
> 
> So I consecutively put 1MB blocks on CEPH.   What I measured is that rados_aio_write gives me about 5 times the speed of rados_write.  I make 128 consecutive writes in for loop to create object of maximum allowed size of 132MB. 
> 
> Now if I do consecutive write from some client into CEPH storage, then what is the recommended buffer size? (I'm trying to debug very poor Bareos write speed of just 3MB/s to CEPH) 
> 
> Thank you, 
> Alexander 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum at redhat.com> wrote:
> It sounds like you are doing synchronous reads of small objects here. In that case you are dominated by the per-op already rather than the throughout of your cluster. Using aio or multiple threads will let you parallelism requests.
> -Greg
> 
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:33 AM Alexander Kushnirenko <kushnirenko at gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> We see very poor performance when reading/writing rados objects.  The speed is only 3-4MB/sec, compared to 95MB rados benchmarking. 
> 
> When you look on underline code it uses librados and linradosstripper libraries (both have poor performance) and the code uses rados_read and rados_write functions.  If you look on examples they recommend rados_aio_read/write.   
> 
> Could this be the reason for poor performance? 
> 
> Thank you, 
> Alexander. _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com [1]

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 

Even the 95MB/s rados benchmark may still be indicative of a problem, it
defaults to creating 16 (or maybe 32) threads so it can be writing to 16
different OSDs simultaneously.  To get a more accurate value to what you
are doing try the rados bench with 1 thread and 1M block size (default
it 4M) such as  

rados bench -p testpool -b 1048576 30 write -t 1 --no-cleanup

  

Links:
------
[1] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20171001/d480b612/attachment.html>


More information about the ceph-users mailing list