[ceph-users] inconsistent pg on erasure coded pool

Gregory Farnum gfarnum at redhat.com
Wed Oct 4 11:34:45 PDT 2017


This says it's actually missing one object, and a repair won't fix that (if
it could, the object wouldn't be missing!). There should be more details
somewhere in the logs about which object.

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 5:03 AM Kenneth Waegeman <kenneth.waegeman at ugent.be>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have some inconsistency / scrub error on a Erasure coded pool, that I
> can't seem to solve.
>
> [root at osd008 ~]# ceph health detail
> HEALTH_ERR 1 pgs inconsistent; 1 scrub errors
> pg 5.144 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting
> [81,119,148,115,142,100,25,63,48,11,43]
> 1 scrub errors
>
> In the log files, it seems there is 1 missing shard:
>
> /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.81.log.2.gz:2017-10-02 23:49:11.940624
> 7f0a9d7e2700 -1 log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : 5.144s0 shard 63(7)
> missing 5:2297a2e1:::10014e2d8d5.00000000:head
> /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.81.log.2.gz:2017-10-03 00:48:06.681941
> 7f0a9d7e2700 -1 log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : 5.144s0 deep-scrub 1
> missing, 0 inconsistent objects
> /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.81.log.2.gz:2017-10-03 00:48:06.681947
> 7f0a9d7e2700 -1 log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : 5.144 deep-scrub 1 errors
>
> I tried running ceph pg repair on the pg, but nothing changed. I also
> tried starting a new deep-scrub on the  osd 81 (ceph osd deep-scrub 81)
> but I don't see any deep-scrub starting at the osd.
>
> How can we solve this ?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> Kenneth
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20171004/75413031/attachment.html>


More information about the ceph-users mailing list