[ceph-users] killing ceph-disk [was Re: ceph-volume: migration and disk partition support]
adeza at redhat.com
Tue Oct 10 05:21:35 PDT 2017
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw at digiware.nl> wrote:
> On 10-10-2017 13:51, Alfredo Deza wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote:
>>> (pet peeve alert)
>>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Sage Weil wrote:
>>>> To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
> Right, that means we need a ceph-volume zfs before things get shot down.
> Fortunately there is little history to carry over.
> But then still somebody needs to do the work. ;-|
> Haven't looked at ceph-volume, but I'll put it on the agenda.
An interesting take on zfs (and anything else we didn't set up from
the get-go) is that we envisioned developers might
want to craft plugins for ceph-volume and expand its capabilities,
without placing the burden of coming up
with new device technology to support.
The other nice aspect of this is that a plugin would get to re-use all
the tooling in place in ceph-volume. The plugin architecture
exists but it isn't fully developed/documented yet.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the ceph-users