[ceph-users] EC K + M Size

Ashley Merrick singapore at amerrick.co.uk
Sat Nov 3 01:11:39 PDT 2018


Tried to do some reading online but was unable to find much.

I can imagine a higher K + M size with EC requires more CPU to re-compile
the shards into the required object.

But is there any benefit or negative going with a larger K + M, obviously
their is the size benefit but technically could it also improve reads due
to more OSD's providing a smaller section of the data required to compile
the shard?

Is there any gotchas that should be known for example going with a 4+2 vs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20181103/1e6a50f7/attachment.html>

More information about the ceph-users mailing list