[ceph-users] Bluestore vs. Filestore

jesper at krogh.cc jesper at krogh.cc
Tue Oct 2 10:28:13 PDT 2018


Hi.

Based on some recommendations we have setup our CephFS installation using
bluestore*. We're trying to get a strong replacement for "huge" xfs+NFS
server - 100TB-ish size.

Current setup is - a sizeable Linux host with 512GB of memory - one large
Dell MD1200 or MD1220 - 100TB + a Linux kernel NFS server.

Since our "hot" dataset is < 400GB we can actually serve the hot data
directly out of the host page-cache and never really touch the "slow"
underlying drives. Except when new bulk data are written where a Perc with
BBWC is consuming the data.

In the CephFS + Bluestore world, Ceph is "deliberatly" bypassing the host
OS page-cache, so even when we have 4-5 x 256GB memory** in the OSD hosts
it is really hard to create a synthetic test where they hot data does not
end up being read out of the underlying disks. Yes, the
client side page cache works very well, but in our scenario we have 30+
hosts pulling the same data over NFS.

Is bluestore just a "bad fit" .. Filestore "should" do the right thing? Is
the recommendation to make an SSD "overlay" on the slow drives?

Thoughts?

Jesper

* Bluestore should be the new and shiny future - right?
** Total mem 1TB+





More information about the ceph-users mailing list